Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 20:59:39 GMT 10
The to see what pages are ranking for each keyword. From that analysis I was able to measure the prevalence of grouping keyword volumes within each category i.e. the percentage of keyword pairs that have grouped volumes and the similarity of the SERPs the number of top ten results that were shared between the two keywords for grouped and ungrouped keyword pairs. Results The results for those metrics are the following I also looked at how common it is that SERPs are exactly identical that is that the top ten results are the same pages in the same order.
This showed an interesting pattern. There are only two categories Greece Mobile Number List with significant numbers of identical SERPsPunctuation and Typos. In the case of keywords with and without punctuation you are more likely to see identical SERPs implying that Google sees the pair of keywords as identical if keyword volumes are grouped than if they are not. This is not a hardandfast rule though there are still some ungrouped keywords which have identical SERPs. In the case of Typos there are no grouped keyword pairs at all that have identical SERPs. keywords in this category it appears that the identical SERPs are coming from showing results for SERPs where Google replaces results for the mistyped keywords with the correct one.
What conclusions can we draw The prevalence of keyword grouping is highest for plurals and very low for typos This may be a result of the sample of keywords used in this study but overall around of keywords in the sample are grouped. This indicates that although this volume grouping is a growing phenomenon in Keyword Planner data it is not yet consistent across all SERPs. There is not a lot of difference between keywords that are grouped by Keyword Planner and those that arent. This is a surprising result. The motivation for conducting this study was to confirm the suspicion that Google associating keyword.
This showed an interesting pattern. There are only two categories Greece Mobile Number List with significant numbers of identical SERPsPunctuation and Typos. In the case of keywords with and without punctuation you are more likely to see identical SERPs implying that Google sees the pair of keywords as identical if keyword volumes are grouped than if they are not. This is not a hardandfast rule though there are still some ungrouped keywords which have identical SERPs. In the case of Typos there are no grouped keyword pairs at all that have identical SERPs. keywords in this category it appears that the identical SERPs are coming from showing results for SERPs where Google replaces results for the mistyped keywords with the correct one.
What conclusions can we draw The prevalence of keyword grouping is highest for plurals and very low for typos This may be a result of the sample of keywords used in this study but overall around of keywords in the sample are grouped. This indicates that although this volume grouping is a growing phenomenon in Keyword Planner data it is not yet consistent across all SERPs. There is not a lot of difference between keywords that are grouped by Keyword Planner and those that arent. This is a surprising result. The motivation for conducting this study was to confirm the suspicion that Google associating keyword.